<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Pepsi Controversy: Did It Score With Women?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wonderbranding.com/2009/10/the-pepsi-controversy-did-it-score-with-women/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wonderbranding.com/2009/10/the-pepsi-controversy-did-it-score-with-women/</link>
	<description>Marketing to Women</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 18:55:17 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Angi Harper</title>
		<link>http://www.wonderbranding.com/2009/10/the-pepsi-controversy-did-it-score-with-women/comment-page-1/#comment-2091</link>
		<dc:creator>Angi Harper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 15:38:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wonderbranding.com/?p=1914#comment-2091</guid>
		<description>Now that you say it, Margaret, I AM more upset about the toy I got in my last Cracker Jack. A puzzle piece. ONE puzzle piece. Like I was going to drive all the way back to Salt Lake City to get 30 more boxes of throwback Cracker Jack boxes in order to finish their stupid puzzle. I WANTED A RUBBER BAND HELICOPTER!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that you say it, Margaret, I AM more upset about the toy I got in my last Cracker Jack. A puzzle piece. ONE puzzle piece. Like I was going to drive all the way back to Salt Lake City to get 30 more boxes of throwback Cracker Jack boxes in order to finish their stupid puzzle. I WANTED A RUBBER BAND HELICOPTER!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Margaret Titus</title>
		<link>http://www.wonderbranding.com/2009/10/the-pepsi-controversy-did-it-score-with-women/comment-page-1/#comment-2088</link>
		<dc:creator>Margaret Titus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 14:37:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wonderbranding.com/?p=1914#comment-2088</guid>
		<description>Another tempest in a teapot that leaves this 60 year old boomer totally underwhelmed.  I&#039;d just as soon get all worked up over an offensive prize in a box of cracker jacks --now that really does date me doesn&#039;t it. I think the biggest problem for Pepsi may be that no one with more than two brain cells gives a hoot and the  marketing &quot;controversy&quot; will hover somewhere between slim and none. Now what was that we were talking about--I seem to have forgotten...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another tempest in a teapot that leaves this 60 year old boomer totally underwhelmed.  I&#8217;d just as soon get all worked up over an offensive prize in a box of cracker jacks &#8211;now that really does date me doesn&#8217;t it. I think the biggest problem for Pepsi may be that no one with more than two brain cells gives a hoot and the  marketing &#8220;controversy&#8221; will hover somewhere between slim and none. Now what was that we were talking about&#8211;I seem to have forgotten&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michele Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.wonderbranding.com/2009/10/the-pepsi-controversy-did-it-score-with-women/comment-page-1/#comment-2086</link>
		<dc:creator>Michele Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 00:34:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wonderbranding.com/?p=1914#comment-2086</guid>
		<description>The more I think about it, the more I&#039;m convinced that they missed the mark because the DIDN&#039;T create the same app, only for women.  That would have been a great balance, and an even bigger hit for Pepsi.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The more I think about it, the more I&#8217;m convinced that they missed the mark because the DIDN&#8217;T create the same app, only for women.  That would have been a great balance, and an even bigger hit for Pepsi.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Gorell</title>
		<link>http://www.wonderbranding.com/2009/10/the-pepsi-controversy-did-it-score-with-women/comment-page-1/#comment-2085</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Gorell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 17:37:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wonderbranding.com/?p=1914#comment-2085</guid>
		<description>(&quot;...they don&#039;t need an app to tell them how to speak to women&quot; is what I meant to write in that last paragraph.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(&#8220;&#8230;they don&#8217;t need an app to tell them how to speak to women&#8221; is what I meant to write in that last paragraph.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Gorell</title>
		<link>http://www.wonderbranding.com/2009/10/the-pepsi-controversy-did-it-score-with-women/comment-page-1/#comment-2084</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Gorell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 17:36:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wonderbranding.com/?p=1914#comment-2084</guid>
		<description>Who&#039;s being stereotyped here -- the female &quot;types&quot; in the app, or AMP&#039;s 18-30 male target segment?

Honestly, how many products are gunning for those emotionally-immature-wannabe-ladies-man dollars?

Real men know their type when they see it, and they don&#039;t need to tell them how to speak to women. That said, this is harmless. If it were reversed, I&#039;m sure we could all come up with just as many stereotypical male profiles, and they&#039;d be equally (albeit marginally) funny.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who&#8217;s being stereotyped here &#8212; the female &#8220;types&#8221; in the app, or AMP&#8217;s 18-30 male target segment?</p>
<p>Honestly, how many products are gunning for those emotionally-immature-wannabe-ladies-man dollars?</p>
<p>Real men know their type when they see it, and they don&#8217;t need to tell them how to speak to women. That said, this is harmless. If it were reversed, I&#8217;m sure we could all come up with just as many stereotypical male profiles, and they&#8217;d be equally (albeit marginally) funny.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angi Harper</title>
		<link>http://www.wonderbranding.com/2009/10/the-pepsi-controversy-did-it-score-with-women/comment-page-1/#comment-2083</link>
		<dc:creator>Angi Harper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 16:47:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wonderbranding.com/?p=1914#comment-2083</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d be more alarmed if Pepsi seemed to take these stereotypes seriously, but it seems like they put a lot of effort into making it funny rather than offensive. And, really, shouldn&#039;t we be happy that they had 27 stereotypes? Instead of three? I&#039;m also impressed with the usefulness of the information provided within the gimmicky package.

As for their response...making a tag for Twitter was a mistake. Especially with Pepsi, rather than AMP. In the long run, though, I think this one will blow over pretty quickly. It was more stupid than dangerous to women and there are bigger battles to wage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d be more alarmed if Pepsi seemed to take these stereotypes seriously, but it seems like they put a lot of effort into making it funny rather than offensive. And, really, shouldn&#8217;t we be happy that they had 27 stereotypes? Instead of three? I&#8217;m also impressed with the usefulness of the information provided within the gimmicky package.</p>
<p>As for their response&#8230;making a tag for Twitter was a mistake. Especially with Pepsi, rather than AMP. In the long run, though, I think this one will blow over pretty quickly. It was more stupid than dangerous to women and there are bigger battles to wage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
