<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Intuition Part II</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wonderbranding.com/2004/04/intuition-part-ii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wonderbranding.com/2004/04/intuition-part-ii/</link>
	<description>Speaking, Workshops, Articles</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 18:39:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: MH</title>
		<link>http://www.wonderbranding.com/2004/04/intuition-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-1579</link>
		<dc:creator>MH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2004 01:01:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wonderbranding.com/dev/2004/04/intuition-part-ii/#comment-1579</guid>
		<description>It is interesting that the comments above are mostly from women and that considerable emphasis is placed on reading faces. I am sure they are right. However much human action take place where no face can be seen and under that circimstance women would have no advantage. Warfare these days is most carried out at great distance where the enemy can not even be seen. If women are so intuitive why were the planes that hit the towers on 9/11 filled with approximately equal numbers of both men and women. Just how strong is this intuition? I will say this, when women are cheating on their husbands they are better at hiding it than the other way round. Women quite simply are better lyers and therefore should be trusted less, even though men may indeed play up more frequently than women.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is interesting that the comments above are mostly from women and that considerable emphasis is placed on reading faces. I am sure they are right. However much human action take place where no face can be seen and under that circimstance women would have no advantage. Warfare these days is most carried out at great distance where the enemy can not even be seen. If women are so intuitive why were the planes that hit the towers on 9/11 filled with approximately equal numbers of both men and women. Just how strong is this intuition? I will say this, when women are cheating on their husbands they are better at hiding it than the other way round. Women quite simply are better lyers and therefore should be trusted less, even though men may indeed play up more frequently than women.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yvonne DiVita</title>
		<link>http://www.wonderbranding.com/2004/04/intuition-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-1580</link>
		<dc:creator>Yvonne DiVita</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2004 13:43:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wonderbranding.com/dev/2004/04/intuition-part-ii/#comment-1580</guid>
		<description>My intuition has saved the day many a time. In fact, it&#039;s so strong, I have people convinced I&#039;m psychic. But, really, the ability to &#039;read&#039; people just by the expression on their faces is not a learned process, as you so aptly said. I rely on my ability to &#039;read&#039; a situation by observing body language and facial expressions, and I am seldom wrong. People just don&#039;t know how transparent they are.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My intuition has saved the day many a time. In fact, it&#8217;s so strong, I have people convinced I&#8217;m psychic. But, really, the ability to &#8216;read&#8217; people just by the expression on their faces is not a learned process, as you so aptly said. I rely on my ability to &#8216;read&#8217; a situation by observing body language and facial expressions, and I am seldom wrong. People just don&#8217;t know how transparent they are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jon</title>
		<link>http://www.wonderbranding.com/2004/04/intuition-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-1581</link>
		<dc:creator>jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2004 13:36:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wonderbranding.com/dev/2004/04/intuition-part-ii/#comment-1581</guid>
		<description>corpus callosum... Never heard of it.. My will enjoy reading this ;).
I have always said the politicians that end up at war because they&#039;ve had enough of speaking are mostly men.
Women would notso quickly send their children to fight whereas men in general would.
I have always said women should be in control and men only fight when their mothers say so.
I think due to this &lt;b&gt;corpus callosum&lt;/b&gt; you highlight I feel more &quot;scientifically&quot; correct than ever in regard to what ails the world so.
Peace, J.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>corpus callosum&#8230; Never heard of it.. My will enjoy reading this <img src='http://www.wonderbranding.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> .<br />
I have always said the politicians that end up at war because they&#8217;ve had enough of speaking are mostly men.<br />
Women would notso quickly send their children to fight whereas men in general would.<br />
I have always said women should be in control and men only fight when their mothers say so.<br />
I think due to this <b>corpus callosum</b> you highlight I feel more &#8220;scientifically&#8221; correct than ever in regard to what ails the world so.<br />
Peace, J.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

